Memecoins have captivated the cryptocurrency world, emerging as viral phenomena driven by internet culture, speculative hype, and promises of overnight riches. 

Originating as a parody of traditional cryptocurrencies, these tokens have evolved into a high-risk, high-reward market segment that attracts millions of retail investors. Yet, behind the alluring narratives lie systemic risks that can result in devastating financial losses, especially for inexperienced participants.

In January 2025, memecoins reached new heights of notoriety with the launch of $TRUMP and $MELANIA, cryptocurrencies introduced by President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump. These tokens generated significant buzz, drew millions of first-time investors, and fueled debates about the ethics and risks of memecoins. 

This article examines the rise of $TRUMP and $MELANIA, the broader phenomenon of memecoins, and the tools and practices necessary to mitigate their inherent risks.

The Trump Token Phenomenon: A Case Study

On January 17, 2025, Donald Trump launched the $TRUMP token, three days before his inauguration. Within days, the token’s market capitalization surged to over $14 billion, driven by fervent trading activity and a powerful branding narrative. Just two days later, on January 19, 2025, Melania Trump launched $MELANIA, which experienced a similar rise, reaching more than $2 billion in market cap during its early trading sessions.

Following those coins ICOs, the $BARRON coin was launched, named after the Trumps' youngest son and experienced a rapid increase in value, reaching over $450 million in market capitalization. However, this surge was short-lived, as the coin's value plummeted by more than 90% shortly after, raising concerns about its legitimacy. 

Experts have later identified $BARRON as a common scam, noting suspicious activities such as spoofed transactions and fake deployments. Nick Ford, a cryptocurrency analyst, highlighted that the team behind $BARRON created fake deployments and purchases from popular addresses to deceive investors. 

The Solana blockchain, known for its low fees and scalability, became the platform for these tokens, recording $35 million in transaction fees during the launch frenzy. However, both tokens soon experienced dramatic price volatility, with early investors profiting at the expense of latecomers. Reports suggest that the Trump family profited significantly from the launch, with Trump-affiliated entities reportedly earning $5 billion through coordinated token sell-offs.

This phenomenon highlighted the speculative nature of memecoins and raised ethical concerns about the involvement of public figures in cryptocurrency markets.

Ownership and Distribution

The $TRUMP token has a total supply of 1 billion tokens, 200 million of which were made available during the initial coin offering (ICO). The remaining 800 million tokens are controlled by Trump-affiliated entities, CIC Digital LLC and Fight Fight Fight LLC, and are scheduled for gradual release over three years.

Such concentrated ownership models raise questions about transparency and the potential for market manipulation as the controller entities are Delaware-based.

The Broader Appeal of Memecoins

Memecoins first gained traction with Dogecoin in 2013, which was created as a parody of Bitcoin. Since then, the memecoin market has grown into a $93 billion industry according to CMC (Coin Market Cap), fueled by tokens like Dogecoin ($DOGE) and Shiba Inu ($SHIBA). These tokens thrive on internet culture, community-driven narratives, and the appeal of financial rebellion, attracting a younger demographic of investors.

Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies, which emphasize utility or technological innovation, memecoins rely on speculative trading and viral marketing, making them appealing to new investors, but also amplifying the risks of financial loss.

The Risks of Investing in Memecoins

While memecoins offer opportunities for quick profits, they are fraught with risks, as mentioned before, particularly for inexperienced investors:

1. Volatility and Speculation

The prices of memecoins are notoriously volatile, often driven by social media hype, celebrity endorsements, and speculative trading. This creates an environment where prices can skyrocket one day and collapse the next, leaving investors vulnerable to significant losses.

2. Highly Concentrated Token Supplies

Many, including $TRUMP, are characterized by centralized ownership structures. When a small group of insiders controls a notable portion of the token supply, they can manipulate prices and execute coordinated sell-offs, draining value from the market and harming retail investors.

3. Vulnerable Smart Contracts

They often suffer from poorly coded or malicious smart contracts. Common vulnerabilities include:

• Rugpulls: Developers withdraw liquidity from the market, leaving tokens worthless.
• Honey Pots: Contracts prevent selling while allowing unlimited buying, trapping investor funds.
• Hidden Fees: Transaction fees embedded in smart contracts siphon off value without investors’ knowledge.

4. Social Media Manipulation

Memecoins thrive on the emotional triggers of FOMO (fear of missing out) and herd mentality, amplified by platforms like Twitter and Telegram. Also, viral marketing campaigns and influencer endorsements often lead to impulsive and poorly informed investment decisions.

5. Lack of Regulation

The unregulated nature of the memecoin market leaves investors unprotected against fraud and manipulation. Unlike traditional financial markets, there are few safeguards to prevent scams, making memecoins a breeding ground for bad actors.

Tools for Mitigating Smart Contract Risks

To protect investors, developers, and the broader ecosystem, a variety of tools have emerged to identify and mitigate smart contract vulnerabilities and many are also used for smart contract auditing, for example:

• AuditOne AI Audit Agents: These tools provide real-time assessments of smart contracts during deployment, identifying vulnerabilities such as reentrancy attacks and unsafe external calls. Audit results are stored immutably on-chain, enhancing transparency.
• Slither: A static analysis tool for Ethereum smart contracts that detects issues like uninitialized variables and reentrancy vulnerabilities.
• Mythril: Uses symbolic execution to uncover flaws in EVM bytecode, such as unchecked low-level calls and self-destruct functions.
• Echidna: A fuzz testing tool that simulates diverse contract states to identify hidden bugs and vulnerabilities.
• Cube3.ai and De.Fi Scanner: Provide continuous monitoring and real-time risk assessment, offering investors tools to track transactions and detect anomalies.

These tools help participants in the crypto market to make more informed decisions, reducing the likelihood of financial loss due to technical vulnerabilities.

Related article: What is a Token Audit, and Why Should You Care About It?

Market Impact and Criticism

The success of $TRUMP and $MELANIA has sparked discussions about the intersection of politics and cryptocurrency. Critics argue that public figures engaging in cryptocurrency ventures could create conflicts of interest, especially if they influence policies that impact the market.

In response to the growing popularity of memecoins, several asset managers have proposed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) dedicated to these assets. However, the speculative nature of memecoins raises concerns about the risks these products may pose to retail investors.

Toward a Safer Ecosystem

To ensure a sustainable and ethical future for memecoins, the industry must prioritize the following:

1. Investor Education: Equip new participants with the knowledge to identify risks and conduct due diligence.
2. Developer Transparency: Implement third-party audits, disclose tokenomics, and establish clear mechanisms for liquidity management.
3. Regulatory Oversight: Develop frameworks to protect investors from fraud and ensure accountability for market participants.

Conclusion

The rise of $TRUMP and $MELANIA highlights both the potential and the risks of memecoins. While these tokens have drawn millions of new participants into the cryptocurrency market, they also expose systemic vulnerabilities like speculative trading and smart contract risks.

Memecoins may never shed their speculative nature entirely, but with the right reforms, they can offer opportunities for both cultural expression and meaningful financial participation.

‍